Should public contracts exclude companies that use aggressive tax avoidance?
Companies benefiting from public money should contribute fairly to public revenue.
Explore ideas before starting your own debate. The opening posts, prepared replies, and contributor profiles in this collection are fictional. Replies labeled Member are from real accounts.
Browse member discussions →Argue your case. Share evidence. Stay open to being wrong. Votes reflect opinions, not verified truth.
Companies benefiting from public money should contribute fairly to public revenue.
A shorter week should give people time back, not compress exhaustion into fewer days.
Leaders should face the people affected by their decisions.
A company changing the arrangement should acknowledge the new expense it imposes.
Applicants should not fund a revenue stream while competing for the same home.
Businesses should price labor honestly instead of adding social pressure at checkout.
A camera should serve a clear purpose rather than monitor compliance.
Training a replacement deserves explicit time and recognition, especially during layoffs.
A low wage at one job should not become a permanent anchor.
The people whose work built the process should share in the resulting gains.
Fair process should apply even when an allegation is disturbing.
Revenue should not purchase permission to mistreat colleagues.