Should employers be banned from using emotion-recognition software in interviews?
A hiring decision should not depend on a machine's guess about a facial expression.
Explore ideas before starting your own debate. The opening posts, prepared replies, and contributor profiles in this collection are fictional. Replies labeled Member are from real accounts.
Browse member discussions →Argue your case. Share evidence. Stay open to being wrong. Votes reflect opinions, not verified truth.
A hiring decision should not depend on a machine's guess about a facial expression.
Users create the audience value and deserve a direct share.
Machines should not independently decide to kill people.
An author must understand the reasoning they ask others to trust.
A convincing replica of your voice or behavior should require your control.
Buying a device should not mean renting whatever features the company still likes.
A joke should not become convincing fake evidence when detached from its original context.
Assessment should show what students can actually produce themselves.
Grief should not become a market for endless simulated relationships.
Essential participation supports universal service, while funding and control require careful choices.
Revenue could support transitions, but defining replacement may discourage beneficial investment.
Competing interests expose the difficulty of turning ethical judgments into rules designed by manufacturers.